Connect with us

    Hi, what are you looking for?

    Reviews

    Google Reveals Strategy to Preserve Third-Party Cookies in Chrome

    Google has altered its course regarding the Privacy Sandbox project for the Internet. In the beginning, Google intended to eliminate third-party cookies from the Web and introduce fresh technology in its Chrome browser to substitute them.

    Third-party cookies are usually stored by resources from other websites loaded on a specific website. For example, when browsing Site A which includes content from Sites B and C, these sites might save third-party cookies on your device.

    While third-party cookies are not inherently negative, they have been misapplied in the past, particularly for user monitoring objectives.

    At first, Google aimed to eradicate third-party cookies on the Web through the Privacy Sandbox project. Given Google’s emphasis on advertising and the importance of tracking for marketing purposes, it was anticipated that Privacy Sandbox would still facilitate some form of tracking.

    In simpler language, Google proposed relocating tracking functions within the web browser and shifting from tracking individual users to tracking user clusters based on browsing behaviors.

    Even though tracking user clusters is viewed as an enhancement over tracking individuals, it sparks privacy worries for numerous users while remaining crucial for marketing companies such as Google.

    Within the Privacy Sandbox project, Google introduced concepts like IP Protection and Tracking Protection. Termed as Privacy Washing by privacy advocates, these notions were crafted to inspire Chrome users to embrace the new system under the facade of improved privacy.

    Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

    Shift in Strategy regarding Third-party Cookies

    Lately, Google has made notable revisions to its strategies. The initial statement by Anthony Chavez, VP of Privacy Sandbox at Google, conveys an optimistic outlook.

    Google appreciates the potential of the Privacy Sandbox but realizes the necessity for substantial performance enhancements.

    Consequently, Google has opted to uphold support for third-party cookies. Instead of phasing them out, Google proposes a system that empowers users to make informed decisions regarding their browsing activities and effect necessary adjustments.

    Specifics about this fresh approach are still limited.

    Concluding Thoughts

    It appears that Google might be retracting its Privacy Sandbox project. While not outright abandoning the feature, it seems to be preserving it temporarily.

    Despite Google committing to persist in delivering Privacy Sandbox APIs and investing in them, the technology seems to be on unsteady ground within Google’s agenda.

    Reading between the lines, Privacy Sandbox might not provide the same level of effectiveness as third-party cookies in terms of advertising and tracking, conceivably posing a risk to Google’s core business and prompting this retraction.

    Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

    It will be intriguing to observe how Google unveils the “fresh experience in Chrome” that allows users to make informed decisions while traversing the web. Google is likely to present more enticing terms to sway users towards decisions that align with its marketing objectives. We will vigilantly monitor this progress.

    Image Source: Aerial Film Studio / Shutterstock

    You May Also Like

    Reviews

    Microsoft has resolved 74 security issues in its software during the company’s August 2023 Patch Tuesday release. The previous month’s update tackled 132 vulnerabilities,...

    Hacks

    An economical high-voltage power supply project has been developed by Sebastian from Baltic Labs. The primary element of this endeavor is a commercial power...

    Hacks

    The issue of compatibility centers around the POPCNT CPU function. TheBobPony’s posts on Twitter uncovered that this function is found in several Windows 11...

    Hacks

    The choice to utilize USB storage was influenced by the nonexistence of Bluetooth and the substandard audio input port in the dated entertainment system....